Reduce the portfolio without removing pages that still provide value.

Content Pruning & Consolidation gives every page a keep, merge, redirect, or remove decision when a portfolio has become difficult to manage. Each action includes evidence, approval, and a rollback plan. You walk away with a keep, merge, redirect, or remove decision for every URL in scope, a signed approval for each destructive action, and a rollback ready before launch.

Team sorting URL cards into keep, merge, and remove piles on a review board

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with

See all references
  • Sanofi
  • Arabam.com
  • Enpara
  • Pozitif Live
  • Mudo
  • Ruffles
  • Armut.com
  • Amazon
  • BMW
  • Shell
  • Hyundai
  • PepsiCo
  • Red Bull
  • Decathlon
  • MediaMarkt
  • Bayer
  • EY
  • KPMG
  • GE
  • 3M
  • Domino’s
  • Lexus
  • Trendyol
  • Hepsiburada

We preserve the current state, classify each URL, map changes, secure approval, and validate the rollout.

  1. Freeze the current state

    We lock the canonical URL inventory, current rankings, links, and conversions as a baseline before anything moves, so we have something to roll back to if needed. Nothing is classified until the content owner has confirmed the baseline inventory is accurate.

    A frozen baseline inventory with owners and dependencies attached.

  2. Classify every URL in scope

    Each page gets sorted by evidence into one of three groups: genuinely unique value, real overlap with another page, or no remaining reason to exist. Before any merge or redirect gets designed, a strategist reads the classified list from end to end.

    A classified list with a proposed action and confidence level for each URL.

  3. Design the merges and redirects

    For anything merging or redirecting, we map exactly where the value goes, keep whatever's unique, and plan one-hop redirects instead of chains. SEO signs off on the merge map before any redirect gets built.

    A merge map and redirect manifest with no redirect chains.

  4. Get destructive calls signed off

    Anything hard to reverse gets a named approver from SEO, legal, product, or engineering before it happens. A named approver from SEO, legal, product, or engineering signs off before anything ships. The agent that flagged the duplicate never gets that authority.

    An approved decision register with sign-off recorded per action.

  5. Ship with a rollback ready

    Redirects go live, we validate them against the plan, and we watch the specific signals that would tell us to roll something back. The content owner confirms the rollback trigger list while the monitoring window is still open.

    Validated redirects, a rollback plan, and a monitoring window.

Every removal has a named human behind it

A thousand-URL inventory needs help with sorting. Agents can cluster pages by topic overlap, flag likely duplicates, and find redirect chains that already exist. That removes much of the manual spreadsheet work. None of those flags is a removal decision. A merge determines which page keeps the framing, while a removal assumes the page no longer serves anyone who needs it. The consequences belong to the people making those calls, so every merge, redirect, and removal has a named approver before launch.

The decision register explains every action, while the redirect manifest and rollback plan make execution safer.

  • an audit report with flagged rows

    Decision register

    Every URL in scope with its classification, proposed action, and confidence level.

  • a URL redirect mapping sheet

    Merge map and redirect manifest

    Exactly where value and traffic should land, with no redirect chains.

  • a quality checklist with ticks

    Validation and rollback plan

    Confirmation the redirects work as designed, plus what to watch and how to reverse a call if it goes wrong.

  • a sign-off log with stamped entries

    Sign-off record

    Who approved each destructive action and when, so an irreversible call always traces back to a specific person.

We call it done when: every destructive action has a named approver, redirects are validated with no chains, and there's a rollback plan on standby.

This is a URL-level decision process. No page gets deleted by an automatic traffic rule.

A good fit when

  • Overlapping pages compete for the same job, but nobody has decided which URL should keep the unique value.
  • Every keep, merge, redirect, or remove call needs evidence and a confidence level, because traffic alone cannot justify an irreversible action.
  • Redirects and merges must preserve the reader's path and existing links, while the team needs a one-hop map it can validate before launch.

Better handled as other work when

  • The plan is to delete every URL below a traffic threshold, while nobody is checking whether a low-traffic page is the only answer to a real question.
  • No SEO, legal, product, or engineering approver can sign the destructive calls, so the merge and removal decisions cannot move safely.
  • The team wants a one-time cleanup without a frozen baseline or rollback trigger, so a broken redirect would have no known state to return to.
  • Screaming Frog

    freezes the full URL inventory before any page gets classified

  • LinkChecker.pro

    retests every signed redirect before and after the merge ships

  • Google Search Console

    the per-URL click history that decides if a page is safe to remove

  • Google Analytics

    the post-launch watch that catches a merge going wrong after release

An incomplete inventory is still useful. We classify what is there, record the evidence behind each call, and show where more information is needed before action.
Talk to a Content Marketing specialist
Two people shaking hands on the start of the work

Will you delete pages that still get some traffic?

Only if the evidence says so, and only with sign-off. A low-traffic page can still be the only answer to a real question, and we check for that before recommending removal.

How do you avoid losing SEO value in a merge?

We map where the unique value in each page goes before anything moves, and use single-hop redirects instead of chains, which is where a lot of avoidable loss happens.

What if a merge goes wrong after launch?

That's what the rollback plan is for. We define upfront what would tell us to reverse a specific action, and keep the pre-change state on hand to do it.

Who actually approves the destructive changes?

The person accountable for the risk approves it. That is usually SEO and the content owner, with legal or product involved when the page touches their area. We record a name and date for every destructive action. Nobody approves an irreversible call alone, and an agent’s duplicate flag carries no authority.