Capture the expert's knowledge in their own words, with clear approval for what can be used.

Important expertise often lives in conversation rather than documentation. We capture it in an interview, organize it into a transcript and claim map, and return only the quotable material the expert has reviewed and approved. You walk away with a reviewed transcript, an approved claim and quotation set, and clear reuse permissions a writer can work from without booking another interview.

An interviewer organizing an expert conversation into a transcript and approved claim map

Some of the 500+ brands we've worked with

See all references
  • İyzico
  • Akakçe
  • İstanbul Gedik Üniversitesi
  • Hotiç
  • Jumbo
  • Armut.com
  • Turna.com
  • Amazon
  • BMW
  • Shell
  • Hyundai
  • PepsiCo
  • Red Bull
  • Decathlon
  • MediaMarkt
  • Bayer
  • Sanofi
  • EY
  • KPMG
  • GE
  • 3M
  • Domino’s
  • Lexus
  • Trendyol

We move from a focused conversation to approved, reusable source material while keeping the expert's meaning and limits intact.

  1. Identify the questions that require this expert

    We define the knowledge gap and focus on questions that general research cannot answer, giving the interview a clear purpose from the start. Before anything is scheduled, the researcher confirms that the questions justify the expert’s time.

    A scoped set of interview objectives and consent conditions.

  2. Prepare follow-ups that uncover useful detail

    The guide asks about decisions, examples, exceptions, and uncertainty so the interview captures more than the expert's first, obvious answer. The researcher chooses follow-up questions that genuinely probe for exceptions.

    A source-aware interview guide built around this expert's actual domain.

  3. Conduct the interview and mark what needs review

    With consent recorded, we lead the conversation and produce a transcript that marks claims, anecdotes, sensitive passages, and points requiring follow-up. Before the transcript is shared, a person identifies sensitive material and removes it from view.

    A full transcript with claims and quotable moments marked.

  4. Turn the transcript into a claim map for approval

    We trace each substantive claim to the transcript. The expert then reviews its meaning, attribution, and publication status, including anything that should remain off the record. The expert is the only one who can approve what gets quoted and what stays off the record.

    An approved claim map with quotable excerpts and clear reuse permissions.

  5. Organize the approved material for future writers

    We arrange approved excerpts and claims by topic so writers can use them in articles, reports, or scripts without repeating the interview. A writer should not have to guess, so the researcher determines how the dossier is organized.

    A knowledge dossier ready to feed multiple downstream pieces.

The transcript is a starting point for approval

Agents can produce a transcript and flag passages that may contain claims, anecdotes, or useful quotations. Meaning and publication permission remain with people. A Zeo interviewer leads the conversation, and the expert reviews every attributed claim and quote, including anything ambiguous or off the record, before the material can be used.

Every deliverable traces back to a conversation the expert has reviewed and cleared for use.

  • an interview transcript with highlighted quotes

    A reviewed interview transcript

    A complete transcript with consent recorded and any sensitive or off-record passages clearly identified.

  • a ledger of link entries

    An approved claim map and quotation set

    Topic-by-topic claims and excerpts, each tied to the expert's words and marked with its approved attribution.

  • a governance charter document

    Clear reuse permissions and unresolved questions

    A practical record of where each passage may appear and which points still need clarification.

We call it done when: the expert has reviewed and approved every claim and quote attributed to them, and the dossier is organized enough that a writer can use it without another interview.

Use this method when the useful knowledge lives in a particular person's experience or judgment. If a generalist could find the same answer through ordinary research, you don't need it.

A good fit when

  • An executive or specialist has relevant experience or judgment that has never been documented clearly.
  • Your content needs attributable insight that desk research and general summaries cannot provide.
  • An inaccurate paraphrase would change the meaning of a specific claim, so the expert's own words and approval have to travel with the material.

Better handled as other work when

  • The request calls for plausible expert commentary without an expert, so an accountable source has to be found before knowledge capture begins.
  • The expert will not review the transcript or decide what may be quoted, so the material cannot carry a reliable permission state into publication.
  • The goal is dozens of lightweight quotations, so the expert's time would be spread thin instead of spent on one reusable conversation.
  • Otter.ai

    records the interview with speaker labels and searchable, timestamped text

  • Airtable

    the claim map: one row per statement, tagged fact or opinion, approval status attached

  • Notion

    the approved-material library future writers actually draw from

Name the person who holds the knowledge and the questions your team needs answered. We run the interview, secure the expert’s approval, and organize the source material for writers.
Discuss an expert interview with us
Two people shaking hands on the start of the work

How much time should the expert set aside?

Most interviews take between 45 minutes and an hour and a half, depending on the scope. We prioritize a few useful lines of inquiry over rushing through every possible question.

Does the expert review the transcript before anyone uses it?

The transcript, claim map, and quotations all go to the expert for review before the dossier reaches a writer.

How do you handle something said off the record?

We mark it immediately and exclude it from all quotable material. The expert decides what is available for publication, and that decision is recorded per item rather than assumed from the interview as a whole. Permissions can also be partial. One section might be cleared for the blog and a conference talk while paid social is refused, and the dossier records that split explicitly so a writer downstream can't accidentally cross the line.

Does this service include writing the finished article?

No. This method creates approved source material. A production method such as SEO Blog Writing handles the finished article.